|
|
|
Converging Public Speaking and College Composition
© |
|
From the Preface
RHETORICAL INSTRUCTION: A CLASSICAL AND MODERN PERSPECTIVE
With The Speaking/Writing Connection:
A Rhetoric, we offer a freshly modern but decidedly classical
approach to teaching rhetorical communication. We synthesize the
instruction of speech and writing because we believe that learning
speaking and writing is best achieved when they are taught together.
This combined approach is based on a premise that language exists
on a continuum and recognizes that literacy has its roots in orality.
Students who learn rhetorical communication this way understand
the immense practical benefits and recognize the dialectical relationship
between speaking and writing. Based on our experience, students
learn each discipline more thoroughly when learning speaking and
writing together and gain an enhanced linguistic and rhetorical
perspective of language, one that views language as a continuum
of rhetorical experiences. In many ways, we favor classical approaches
to rhetoric, but our enterprise is decidedly modern. Though we model
our book on some classical approaches to teaching speaking and writing,
we approach communication as an integral part of human growth and
helpful in explaining human behavior. Historically, the practice
of argumentation and the study of persuasion began as an oral discipline
in preliterate societies.
The discipline of rhetoric grew in significance when classical Greece
shifted from the rule of monarchs to the earliest forms of democracy.
In democratic societies, ordinary citizens became increasingly responsible
for governing their communities. Citizens, not always accustomed
to having a public voice, engaged in active dialogues and made persuasive
speeches about issues, topics, policies and laws. Teachers, called
sophists, seized upon this social need and focused on teaching the
skills of argumentation. Of course, there were competing claims
as to what a rhetorical education should encompass. These sophists
taught the discipline of rhetoric as a set of skills to be used
by their students in their political, legislative and judicial battles.
However, Plato, Aristotle and Isocrates re-visioned rhetoric as
philosophical, ethical and civic endeavors. Their collective effort
further systematized rhetoric into a broader social and educational
discipline.
As literacy grew out of social necessity, rhetoric moved to a literate-based
communication. This transition allowed citizens who lacked the confidence
in public speaking, such as Isocrates, to use writing to argue their
points. Other orators used writing to help prepare speeches or hired
logographers (speech writers) to teach them how to act and speak
in front of a critical audience of listeners. The advent of writing
allowed politicians and political commentators to transcribe and
preserve their oral performances for people to read. In one sense,
rhetoric nourished the development of public speaking and, after
the advent of writing, nurtured the development of argumentative
writing. From a modern perspective, we all understand that writing
can help us with speaking; we use outlines, notes, or scripts because
speaking from a written text allows us to be thorough and accurate
by relying on writing rather than our memories. This relationship
can lead to giving good speeches. But we also understand that our
inner voice assists us when we compose our papers. Quite often,
teachers and students will converse about papers in all of the stages
of writing, from drafting and composing to editing and revising.
More from the Preface: Speaking
and Writing: A Dialectical Approach
The Speaking/Writing Connection:
A Rhetoric
David Ryan and Fredel Wiant
From the Preface | Table
of Contents | Review
Order form, click here:
Paperback | Adobe eBook on CD | Exam Copy
© 2007
248 pages, softbound/perfect binding
List price: $30.00
for single copy orders
Adobe e-book: $20.00 on CD or via e-mail
|
|
|
Parthenon
West Books |
|
|
|